<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Google SearchWiki Experiment, Review, and Tutorial; Now Removed &amp; Back Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.refugedesign.org/blog/new-google-searchwiki-experiment-review-and-tutorial-now-removed-back-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.refugedesign.org/blog/new-google-searchwiki-experiment-review-and-tutorial-now-removed-back-again/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Company in Tampa Florida</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:41:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Lookadoo</title>
		<link>http://www.refugedesign.org/blog/new-google-searchwiki-experiment-review-and-tutorial-now-removed-back-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Lookadoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.refugedesign.org/?p=99#comment-3</guid>
		<description>You bring up some good points about privacy and reputation management. The later is a huge concern, as Google users now have control over demoting and writing comments about others. 

It appears most of the sentiment about the personalized SearchWiki is negative.

I guess the only control we have is to experiment to help us understand what they are doing. So far, their reasoning behind this move has been shallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up some good points about privacy and reputation management. The later is a huge concern, as Google users now have control over demoting and writing comments about others. </p>
<p>It appears most of the sentiment about the personalized SearchWiki is negative.</p>
<p>I guess the only control we have is to experiment to help us understand what they are doing. So far, their reasoning behind this move has been shallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
